#should #gamers #accountable #game #war #persona #sie. Posted October 7, 2013 Founded by Frank Galli in 2000, Snipers Hide has been offering informational videos, podcasts, and other support to its users in one location. 12K Likes, 302 Comments. The International Committee of the Red Cross has confirmed that it won't prosecute gamers for participating in pretend war crimes, but that doesn't mean it wants to leave the topic alone. If you look at the Guardian article, Red Cross is suggesting that videogames be more realistic and have in-game consequences for committing war crimes: And Red Cross says they don't want to ruin anyone's fun; they just want "realistic" war games to address the same political and social consequences of real wars. Quote: The Red Cross wants to have a greater influence in the virtual world of battlefields. The trial was the first prosecution of a Russian service member for war crimes committed in Ukraine since the Feb. 24 invasion. The ICRC is focusing strictly on games that "simulate real-war situations." Yes that will make games soooo much more enjoyable by inserting nagging fucking lawyers. So how can players be made accountable for their actions beyond simple gameplay devices? Has lost 85% of its territory in the 4th era. AlternativeOk1808 4 days ago Lemme see my list Though I actually play pretty nice. With arcade or semi-arcade style games (Call of Duty and Battlefield respectively), it isn't suitable, sure it's a pipe dream. LeCard's example of enemies looking to surrender, having to subdue them, handcuff them, handle that aspect of the mission instead of just "er mah gerd shert shert shert them all, keep sherting til they're all deeeerd!". No Votes: 18 94.7% Other Votes: . These games were rarely straightforward escapist action yarns, they brought grit and tactical depth, and they did so by utilising Clancy's idea of a world overrun by warring techno factions.. The ICRC says it is now working directly with the developers of modern military simulations and the BBC report contains an interview with Marek Spanel of Bohemia Interactive, creator of the Arma series, who claims the studios games will now be implementing the suggestions. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? By checking this box I consent to the use of my information for the above purpose. A series of international statutes, conventions and norms have developed and identify a range of violations related to armed conflict. I don't even think that's what the ICRC wants it doesn't want moral doubt to arise purely through aesthetics, it wants designers to think about international law, and about how warfare should operate. Is teabagging a freshly made corpse a war crime? Mongoose, High Rock - Geographically cutoff from the rest of the empire. A well disciplined enemy! - ranks. I was just following orders. The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. I mean why put your self out online if you have such a weak self image if what someone you may never meet or know could influence your feelings or make you day or even a minute of your day bad , why ? Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? 2022 Monday Good Morning Good Night. Author Topic: Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? If all transgressions automatically lead to failure, it's a zero-sum game that invites only functional thinking. to FFXIV. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Success means blending in with the terror squad, and it's up to the player to decide whether that extends as far as shooting civilians. "We're not trying to make games boring or preachy, but were hoping that the ones that offer a realistic portrayal of a modern battlefield can incorporate some sort of reward or penalties depending on whether they follow the basic rules of armed conflict. >_>. We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. That sounds like a really fun video game. Buddy, that's amature stuff compared to r/RimWorld. If you look at the Guardian article, Red Cross is suggesting that videogames be more realistic and have in-game consequences for committing war crimes: The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. All Rights Reserved, By submitting your email, you agree to our. Never listen to games journalists. Why though? 1. TikTok video from TommyKay (@tommykaydaily): "Should gamers go to jail for ingame war crimes? Talk about a victimless crime. I don't think Prototype would count under "realistic war game", (PS, that's a cool raccoon drawing. "Nobody ever considers themselves to be the villain.". warp scramble them for 8 hours sometime, that's grief. I don't see where Red Cross is calling for gamers to be punished. In the heat of the game, facing a furious mob, many players will take the lethal option but they sure as hell think about it. Please check out our wiki page, where we post template albums of popular media! 17 Sep 2022 19:30:26 . A Q&A document posted on the organization's website. So I take out a Tristan vs his Thorax and we begin. Dont kill last guy take him to me. ShOuLD GAmers bE aCcOunTaBle foR iN gAmE wAr cRiMeS | Let's Talk War Loch 393 subscribers Subscribe 194 Share 4.9K views 2 years ago Sorry about the gusts of breath, As most of you probs. I suggest folks read the article before going "OMG PC" or "OMG IDIOTS." Remember, no Russian. Realism is good, yes, but to an extent. Besides, 'realism' in cases such as this would likely amount to pushing particularly political agendas. It essentially boils down to "shoot" and "don't shoot" targets like in the arcade shooters. Of course, this was really more about mechanics than ethics: players were being tested on their reactions and visual awareness, and failure meant a reduction in game time rather than a few moments' reflection on innocent victims. ), Torture, holding hostages, suicide (assist), terrorism, illegal experiments, assaulting minors (technically not in mc but through it), and more i just cant remember how many life sentences is this worth? Jeezsmdh. What you won't get is a military tribunal and a dishonorable discharge. In Modern Warfare 2's notorious No Russian mission a US soldier is embedded with a Russian terrorist organisation and must take part in a mass killing at an airport. . - Mongoose - 10-06-2013 Seems interesting to be aware of, although not applicable (or is it?) The ICRC's Franois Snchaud justified his organisation's request for consequences, saying "it's very difficult to make the distinction between real footage and the footage you can get from video games." Though that's touching on a political debate I'd probably best not fire up on a site like this. The ICRC says sanitizing video games is not realistic. Anyone who's played a GTA game knows you want to avoid killing cops because the game is unplayable if your wanted level is filled up. People aren't held accountable for war crimes in real life too tbh. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. Fun fact: we deliver faster than Amazon. Video games, while violent and often depicting death, do not result in the real world equivalent of dead people. Seems to me that without naming names there are a fair number of politicians in my country and others that we can comfortably say are guilty of willful war crimes and crimes against humanity, but instead y'all wanna go on a witch hunt because someone plays Terran in Starcraft 2? Signup Login. For the purpose of this Statute, crime against humanity means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack: Deportation or forcible transfer of population. The, Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Really!? Video games can be violent, and thanks to all the shooting, maiming, and killing going on in many titles moralists of all stripes have deemed them a Very Serious Problem for young people. . His claim may be valid: in 2011, British broadcaster ITVused footage from video gameArma II to illustrate purported paramilitary action. We are, though, surely heading into an era where gamers will have to take greater responsibility for their actions if only because the visual fidelity will be there to splatter our violent failings across the screen in HD detail. It's supposedly what we all agreed were the "rules" of war. Hahaha 'no russian' would have half the men ages like 18-30 locked up and on death row right now. I shot my team mate in the ass in Arma III and ran over all the civilians in the first grand theft auto. But then if the consequences of illegal operations are subsumed into the gameplay mechanics i.e. Ukraine, the U.S and its allies accuse Russian forces of targeting civilians indiscriminately, but Russia has consistently denied doing so. This is something military games have been telling us for many years. That leaves games with what the ICRC describes as "more fictional" settings fantasy and sci-fi out of the equation, but means the proposed consequences would be seen in games such asBattlefield 4 orCall of Duty: Ghosts, were their developers to acquiesce to the Committee's requests. This is something military games have been telling us for many years. "Putin's shelling of Europe's largest nuclear plant takes his reign of . It adds immersion. Though now that i stop to think about it, is modern war anything other than it twitched shoot it? I just wanted the Sudetenland. A Q&A document posted on the organisation's website explains: The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. ODogX 6 may 2020 692 27 *remembers what happened in Dubai* BUKLAU_CHANG 6 may 2020 618 46 Should politicians be held accountable for the wars they start? On the other hand, the ICRC feels players found "respecting the law of armed conflict" should be rewarded. Should non-gamers be accountable for real-world war crimes? AllAmericanNegr0 8 oct 2021. This is something military games have been telling us for many years. F FlyToAllWorld New Member Jun 13, 2013 40 Oct 17, 2013 #7 And as said aboveif you're playing COD: Black Ops (or any game) on zombie mode, there are no laws. I remember my first go on Taito's explosive arcade title Operation Wolf it was the late-80s and this frenzied blast-'em-up, with its jungle environment and hostage rescue missions, was clearly gunning for a generation of Rambo II fanatics. tl;dr all the posts, can't be assed to detail a response to this besides: Have fun watching your game sales tank (HAH?) That Red Cross person should understand that it is just a game and not reality. 311 6. . The jury of Tenno looking in disbelief as the defense lawyer starts committing more war crimes against the plaintiffs to prove Saryn's innocence meanwhile the Judge is either joining in on the war crimes or died instantly. So I say fine and have my guys ready to launch just in case. The way that mobile phone hacking lets us see into the personal problems of potential targets in Watch Dogs. Yeeeeah, I'm doomed if they manage to do anything with this. In a scene reminiscent of the Black Hawk Down incident, they must decide whether to shoot their way out or face death. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. I remember my first go on Taitos explosive arcade title Operation Wolf it was the late-80s and this frenzied blast-em-up, with its jungle environment and hostage rescue missions, was clearly gunning for a generation of Rambo II fanatics. The only way I could see games getting more realistic in this type of respect would be to add a sort of PoW feature instead of just busting in a room and killing all the bag guys without any option for them to surrender. Same. Hehe, yea.Sun Tzu would be laughing at all this. Arma 2: The Red Cross believes that as video games become ever more realistic, they should also adhere to international rules of warfare. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. It is also only suggesting this for games that represent realistic military situations. PhantOS. Hangar 13. You are using an out of date browser. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Yes gamers should be held responsible. In a BBC news report earlier this week, however, Francois Senechaud from the International Committee of the. The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. "It's difficult to make out the difference between real footage and the footage you get from video games.". If courts were to punish you for virtual crimes, it should be their responsibility to say what you can and what you can't do in the game yet people are charged for crimes in the . Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Killing civilians gets points deducted or what-have-you, while shooting the baddies progresses the game or gets you points. Dont shoot the civilians. With this thinking Ill get a call from my insurance company when I crash a G6 in Grand theft auto. By You can war dec any PC corp for any reason, keep the war going for as long as you want, suicide gank every one of their toons when they leave for NPC corps and it still aint griefing. Seriously, including this sort of responsible realism isn't going to spoil anyone's fun. I don't think anyone would appreciate someone saying that about us based on a headline. I would be right now biggest war crimer in world history. Butfrom a serious perspective this article refers to realistic conflict and it makes absolute sense that people, especially young impressionable people are made to realise that actions in the real world have consequences. Thanks for submitting to r/MemeTemplatesOfficial. They can go ahead and give an opinion but at the end of the day, people like me couldn't GAF. In a BBC news report earlier this week, however, Francois Senechaud from the International Committee of the Red Cross told a reporter that, due to the increasing verisimilitude between first-person shooters and real-life combat, games should start to abide by the international laws of armed conflict. radicalislamgaming 3 feb 2022. Thread starter Spawn; Start date Oct 5, 2013; Menu . nup thats the check if they are really dead test, ^^^^ no, but getting left with blue balls after a pillow fight with one of the girls. Just by the name alone people said it was a bully simulator. If governments aren't being held accountable for war crimes anymore, why should people playing video games? The rules would just be a nice little piece of cheese for him to get us to follow into his traps. Having more of these games with varied missions, rules/laws you have to abide by, etc. The Arma series currently on its third iteration is detailed enough to be used for training purposes by many of the world's standing armies. Boy they would hate what I did with my evil characters in skyrim and fallout 4. I don't think this was about introducing more reality to games, that was just the most convincing excuse they could conjure up. Barrett explained that the ICRC were already working with production companies to incorporate these rules into games and others who they had not contacted, had also incorporated some of them into their products. I loved how when the GTA series first came into the public and right away people were saying it's nothing but a game where you kill cops all day. The Open Society Foundations support international and Ukrainian organizations working to gather evidence of war crimes, aggression, and crimes against humanity committed during Russia's war against Ukraine and advocate for accountability, including: The 5 AM Coalition, a partnership uniting dozens of Ukrainian human rights organizations to . ? Shooting civilians, torture, attacking ambulances and killing prisoners are all aspects in video games that they want to address, he explained. Keith Stuart: The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws, punishing player characters for war crimes. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Is this feasible? It'd make hell of a lot of sense to add to the realism. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Hammerfell - 2 factions are always in civil war with neither holding firm leadership Black Marsh - Is a disgusting swamp Even after the Tsaesci rulers there was still the Tribunal. Most of the games are a relief to people, a window to be what they want to do, in certain games, these activities are the whole point of the game, lie, kill and win. W2RhdGEtdG9vbHNldC1ibG9ja3MtZmllbGRzLWFuZC10ZXh0PSJmNWNlOGM4OGFiOTUxNGIxZTJkMTgzMTYwOTZjN2Y5YyJdIHsgZm9udC1zaXplOiAxNHB4O2xpbmUtaGVpZ2h0OiAxLjJlbTsgfSBbZGF0YS10b29sc2V0LWJsb2Nrcy1maWVsZHMtYW5kLXRleHQ9ImY1Y2U4Yzg4YWI5NTE0YjFlMmQxODMxNjA5NmM3ZjljIl0gcCB7IGZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTRweDtsaW5lLWhlaWdodDogMS4yZW07IH0g, The military in education & youth activities, Resources to use with political representatives, Anti-war activists battle to get their voices heard in WW1 centenary events, War crimes in video games should be punished, ICRC says, A Q&A document posted on the organisations website, Militarisation in everyday life in the UK: a conference report, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. This is a reminder we also have a Discord server where you can share templates, request them or just have a nice chat, level up and unlock server perks. What would be the fun in games if we couldn't massacre civillians? Shishimarin pleaded guilty to shooting Oleksandr Shelipov, 62, in . Our intention is not to spoil players enjoyment by for example, interrupting the game with pop-up messages listing legal provisions or lecturing gamers on the law of armed conflict. The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. Now of course it would get boring if everyone gave up, but having the random enemy throw their hands up and surrender would add some realism to the game, and force the player to pay attention to the room instead of the standard, it twitched shoot it rule. It is these sorts of split-second decisions that really suggest something about the complexities of combat. In Spec Ops: the Line, three soldiers are stranded in a wrecked Dubai facing a crowd of angry locals and must decide whether to shoot or face death. There is a big line between reality and the virtual world and for example, I cannot remember a video game shooter where I'm gunning civilians. Ace Combat players: #should #gamers #accountable #game #war #ace #combat. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed. These days, if you accidentally (or otherwise) shoot a civilian or comrade in a military shooter, youll probably get a mission failed message and a one-way trip back to the last checkpoint. The game may be over but the choices remain and by ending chapter of Waking Dead with a guide to the actions of other players, developer Telltale Games cleverly addresses and confronts the process. Ukraine has also accused Russia of genocide, listed. This topic makes me laugh. Tsk, tsk. Post your templates or request one instead! But what it wouldnt let you do was kill passing civilians: collateral damage of this sort took a big chunk off your health bar. At least I don't play real world war games. Remember, no russian. Should actors be accountable for a murder in their movie? Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? As if the loss of 7 billion people due to genocide was just a footnote. Titles like Fable, Heavy Rain, Walking Dead and Dishonored all provide different paths for a player depending on their moral decisions during play and because the action is combined with a confirming narrative element, the meaning and weight of transgression can come through.

Distractions Contribute To Approximately 1 Out Of 20 Collisions, Applinked Codes For Adults, Wollaton Hall Wedding Caterers, Racism Is Implicit In Hospitality And Tourism Industry, Articles S